Dr. Phillip Stone

Archivist, Sandor Teszler Library

HeaderImage

In-Class Presentation notes

Posted on October 3, 2012 by stonerp

 

State In-Class Presentation
Southern Politics – Fall 2012

 

You’ll be working with the other person or persons who are covering your state, if you aren’t working on your state alone.  As you divide up the work, make sure you all do an equal portion of the work. 

Your presentation will lead off our discussion of your state.  Be ready on the date assigned.  If you have a crisis, let me know and I’ll see what adjustment we might be able to make.  You should plan for your portion to run for 10-15 minutes or so – and if there are more than 2 of you, you might take a little longer.  At the maximum, think 20 minutes. 

Overall, your presentation should give us a good briefing on politics in the state.  One way to think about it – imagine that you are giving a briefing to a bunch of journalists from other states who are going to be spending time reporting on this state, like before a presidential primary.  What would you want to know yourself before being sent to cover that state (besides where to find a good restaurant)?

Here are some things that your presentation should address.

Demographics:  What does the population of your state look like?  What percentage of the population is African-American, Hispanic, or other?  Is it an urban state or a rural state?  What are the primary cities or regions? Where are elections usually won or lost? 

Economics:  What are the principal industries? Remember, tourism is an industry! 

Politics:  Remember, demographics and economics affect politics, so you should explain how.  Does one part of the state have more influence politically than others?  Does industry exert influence over politics?  Do any other groups – religious, environmental, civic – have influence?  What issues have been at the forefront?

Political structure: Is the governor powerful or weak?  How does the governorship compare to other states?  How about the legislature? How are judges selected, by the voters, by the governor, by the legislature?  Is the executive branch large (lots of officers elected by the voters) or small (only a few, like the governor alone elected by the voters)?   Is the constitution old or new? 

Elections: Which party is dominant?  When did it become dominant?  Or is this a swing state?  Think about presidential elections, elections for the Senate and House, and state elections – like the governor and legislature. 

History: I’ll hit some of the older material after you have finished your presentation, but think about defining characteristics for the state.

Conclusions: How important is the state to regional or national politics? Is the direction of the state positive?  Are things getting better or worse? Is this state still “southern,” whatever that means? 

Suggested sources:  The Almanac of American Politics, the Book of the States, and the four major books on Southern Politics – Key, Bass and De Vries, Alexander Lamis, and Charles Bullock have chapters on each state.  See what these tell you about your state.  Your newspaper readings should inform your work as well. 

Format:  PowerPoints are fine.  Video clips are fine  (We’ll do more on political ads later in the semester, but showing these are OK.) 

October 22:   Alabama:

October 24: Georgia:

October 26: Mississippi:

October 29: Louisiana:

October 31: South Carolina:

November 2 (No class)        

November 5: North Carolina:

November 7: Virginia:

November 9: Tennessee:

November 12: Arkansas:

November 14: Florida:

November 16: Texas:

November 19:Any other states?  (West Virginia and Maryland)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on In-Class Presentation notes |
line

Reading questions for Key and Frederickson

Posted on September 23, 2012 by stonerp

Here are some questions for this week's readings.  

V. O. Key, chapter 1

Remember that this book was written in the late 1940s. Key has become a classic study of southern politics, and a lot of other historians and political scientists use his model for describing the South.
 
What is Key’s main argument or theme in this introductory chapter?
 
What did Key see as the South's main problem in the early 20th century?
 
What are the "special problems" that relate to this main problem?
 
How does Key believe people outside the South view the region's politics? Does he think they're right?
 
Around what does Key believe southern politics revolve?
 
Despite this, why does Key believe that viewing the South's politics this way is simplistic?
 
What particular group of whites does Key think drive the region's politics? (What region of the South did they come from?)
 
What two great crises did these regions face?
 
What was the legacy of the planter-industrialist defeat of populism?
 
How does one-party rule in much of the South affect the region's politics?
 

Kari Frederickson, The Dixiecrat Revolt, chapter 5, The Dixiecrat Presidential Campaign

These may be helpful in the reading for Wednesday

We pick up in this chapter just after Strom Thurmond and Fielding Wright have received the States Rights Democratic nomination for president and VP. This chapter focuses on their campaign, on the attempts to get on the ballot, and on the election. 

What did the Dixiecrats hope to accomplish by running against the national Democrats?

What challenges did the Dixiecrats face in mounting their campaign in 1948?

How did they get on the ballot?

What issues did the Dixiecrats focus on?

Within the South, where did the Dixiecrats fare best?

What seemed to be the key to Dixiecrat success in each state?

line

LibGuide for the class

Posted on September 13, 2012 by stonerp

The LibGuide for the class is available here:

http://libguides.wofford.edu/gov333

line

State Assignments

Posted on September 12, 2012 by stonerp

Alabama

Holladay
Gieser
 
Arkansas
-Nobody selected
 
Florida
McCurry
McMillan
 
Georgia
Banks
Kennedy
Clark
 
Louisiana
Padula
Neely
Osborne
 
Mississippi
Cockcroft
 
North Carolina
Boyles
Hardison
Young
 
South Carolina
Gault
Witherspoon
Hildebrand
 
Tennessee
Richardson
Daniels
 
Texas
Tollison
Frost
 
Virginia
Selvakumar
Bradshaw
 
Maryland
Summers
 
West Virginia
Ringel
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on State Assignments |
line

PowerPoints for Wednesday and Friday lectures

Posted on September 7, 2012 by stonerp

I've updated the powerpoint slides for Wednesday's and Friday's class – they are on my W drive.

http://webs.wofford.edu/stonerp/

Each link has the slides for that class.  

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on PowerPoints for Wednesday and Friday lectures |
line

Perman, Chapter 1

Posted on September 4, 2012 by stonerp

 

Study/Reading questions:

 

Where were the federalists stronger in the south

What were their attitudes toward the populace?

What was the level of party competition like in the south?

Likewise, what was the Republican party organization like?

Describe the style of campaigning that developed in the antebellum south. 

How were candidates selected for local and state office?  How did this differ from the north?

How was the Republican presidential nominee selected?  By what group?

How were electors chosen?

How did the Virginia dynasty control national politics?

What was the Richmond junto? 

 What is the irony in the degree of organization in Virginia? 

Were there divisions in the republican partyin the south, and if so, what were they?

What upset the more conservative of the Jeffersonian Republicans?

Posted in Outlines | Comments (2) |
line

PowerPoints from Class

Posted on October 31, 2011 by stonerp

Here is the link to the website where I've posted the last 3 sets of slides from class.

http://webs.wofford.edu/stonerp/

Enjoy…

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on PowerPoints from Class |
line

Notes from class today

Posted on October 24, 2011 by stonerp

 

Where we are: in the 1980s
Presidential Voting in the South – Republicans dominate.
Congressional and Statewide voting in the South
       Democrats continue to dominate.
       1980 saw election of Republican US Senators in NC, GA, FL, AL, joining GOP Senators in SC, TX, VA, TN, NC, and MS
       Most states still had Democratic governors and strong legislative dominance by Democrats. 
       The US House remained about 2/3 Democratic through the 1980s – for reasons such as strength of incumbency, candidate recruitment, the ability of white Democrats in the South to distance themselves from the national party, and the ability of Democrats to build bi-racial coalitions in districts with 20-40% o their populations were African-Americans.
       Reagan continued to grow in popularity in the South.
       No Democrat in the 1980s won an electoral vote in the South (Except for Carter winning Georgia in 1980)
       Gradually some Democrats began to switch parties to identify with Ronald Reagan, and Republicans got better at candidate recruitment and support. 
       Republicans continued to make inroads in the local level, but could not get beyond 40 or so seats, largely from suburban districts. 
McKee, Chapter 3, Electoral Effects of Redistricting
       What does McKee suggest caused the electoral shakeup in the South in 1992 and 1994?  Redistricting following the 1990 census, and a new interpretation of the Voting Rights Act that forced legislatures to maximize minority voting strength.  This allowed minorities to select candidates of their own choosing.
What would it take to cause the Democrats to lose their majority?
       It was going to take a shock to the system – like redistricting – to break voters’ allegiance to the Democrats. 
How did the outcome of the 1992 and 1994 elections differ from those in 1986, 1988, and 1990 for U. S. House seats?
       Republicans picked up new seats won in reapportionment in 1992, then took advantage of Democratic retirements and shifting loyalties in 1994 to win a majority of seats in Congress from the 11 southern states. 
What were the two partisan effects of redistricting? Explain them.
       One is redistricting – and shifting minority voters into majority minority districts, and thus creating more heavily white districts.  (Packing and Bleaching.)  The other is putting voters who are unfamiliar with the congressman or congresswoman into the district, votes who have no allegiance to the member.  Those people are more likely to vote for a challenger.  A third challenge is candidate recruitment. 
How did the 1982 Voting Rights Act differ from the 1965 Act?
       It called for maximizing minority voting strength. 
What was the ultimate result of the 1982 Act – in the early 1990s?
       It led to the creation of significant numbers of majority-black (or majority-Hispanic) districts.  Thus surrounding districts were heavily white.  
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Notes from class today |
line

Morning in America

Posted on October 12, 2011 by stonerp

Ronald Reagan's 1984 "Morning in America" Ad

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EU-IBF8nwSY

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Morning in America |
line

Nixon, Wallace, and the Southern Strategy

Posted on October 5, 2011 by stonerp

Questions to consider as we move into the post-civil rights era:

Southern distinctiveness versus southern influence on American politics

 

The 1968 presidential election

http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/national.php?year=1968

 

How does the 1968 election affect the course of politics?

Who does Richard Nixon target?

Who does George Wallace target?

How does the addition of African-American voters to the electorate change voting patterns?

How does Nixon try to appeal to southerners, and which southerners does he try to appeal to?

What's George Wallace's campaign style?

After 1968, where will Wallace's voters go?

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Nixon, Wallace, and the Southern Strategy |
line